administrators

@dee-lalwani Hmmm. That is almost a 2 year old post, so things could definitely have changed.

I might scan the release notes for relevant changes: https://fusionauth.io/docs/v1/tech/release-notes

Either way, if you see behavior that is different, you can open a feature request. We rank future work in a variety of ways, but popular feature requests from the community are definitely high on the list.

FYI, providing step by step repro steps for this feature would be most helpful, as well as your current version.

You could also spin up a version from Sep 2020, maybe Version 1.19.8, and see if it has the behavior you want.

Depends on the use case. If you need a user management tool with OAuth, SAML and all the bells and whistles, then “yes!”

If you need LDAP connected to servers or wifi, then “no”.

Hello. I’m be to FusionAuth and I’d like to ask you a question. Can FusionAuth be used instead of Active Directory as a directory solution?

Release notes: https://fusionauth.io/docs/v1/tech/release-notes#version-1-37-0

Blog post: https://fusionauth.io/blog/2022/08/10/announcing-fusionauth-1-37

Hiya,

We'll be doing some regular office hours. For the first one, you can go here: https://go.fusionauth.io/office-hours-on-auth-registration and sign up to get the link and be reminded when it is about to begin.

@akash-0

Hi!

FusionAuth does not currently have such an API. If you'd like to request this feature, you can file an issue in the fusionauth-issues GitHub repository that includes details for your use case. Developers can show their support/interest for a feature by giving it a thumbs up reaction. We use this to plan the FusionAuth product roadmap.

Thanks,
Spencer

Yes. Here's the PR merging it:

https://github.com/SocialiteProviders/Providers/pull/877

Thanks to https://github.com/danilopolani for adding it.

Should show up here: https://socialiteproviders.com/about/ once this has been merged: https://github.com/SocialiteProviders/website/pull/28

Hey all, is there a FusionAuth laravel socialite provider?

@bryan-odaly

The http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#rsa-sha1 algorithm has been removed as of Java 17.

More details:
https://github.com/FusionAuth/fusionauth-site/issues/1202
https://fusionauth.io/docs/v1/tech/release-notes#version-1-32-0

This error means you are using an SAML v2 IdP that is signing their Authn response with RSA-SHA1. The best way to solve this is to change the signing configuration if you have access to that, or request the owner of that IdP sign their response using a more secure, modern algorithm.

@chalk Did you get this sorted out or are you still looking for guidance?