<![CDATA[Topics tagged with java client]]>https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/tags/java clientRSS for NodeSun, 12 Apr 2026 12:43:40 GMTInvalid Date60<![CDATA[Are the post and get forms of the user search API equivalent?]]>Yes, they are equivalent. Building this JSON:

{ "search": { "queryString": "fusionauth.io" } }

and posting it is equivalent to a GET with queryString=fusionauth.io.

]]>https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/865/are-the-post-and-get-forms-of-the-user-search-api-equivalenthttps://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/865/are-the-post-and-get-forms-of-the-user-search-api-equivalentInvalid Date<![CDATA[Searching for users with the java client]]>Looking at https://github.com/FusionAuth/fusionauth-java-client/blob/master/src/main/java/io/fusionauth/client/FusionAuthClient.java#L3256

It appears there is no way to search using the Java client that uses a GET, only a POST. However, you can still provide the queryString in the JSON and it will be equivalent to the GET request.

Building this JSON:

{ "search": { "queryString": "fusionauth.io" } }

Is equivalent to queryString=fusionauth.io.

Hope that helps.

]]>https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/850/searching-for-users-with-the-java-clienthttps://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/850/searching-for-users-with-the-java-clientInvalid Date<![CDATA[Patching the user object with the java client?]]>I see patchUser here:

https://github.com/FusionAuth/fusionauth-java-client/blob/1.19.0/src/main/java/io/fusionauth/client/FusionAuthClient.java#L1664

I think that's what you want.

You can, however, always full retrieval and a put as a workaround. That is recommended if you are changing an array, unless you want the behavior documented here: https://github.com/FusionAuth/fusionauth-issues/issues/441

]]>https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/759/patching-the-user-object-with-the-java-clienthttps://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/759/patching-the-user-object-with-the-java-clientInvalid Date