<![CDATA[Topics tagged with registrations]]>https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/tags/registrationsRSS for NodeWed, 16 Sep 2026 09:59:42 GMTInvalid Date60<![CDATA[Does adding a new registration to an application count as an MAU]]>Yes, this does trigger an MAU increase.

Here's a list of what makes a user active during a month: https://fusionauth.io/docs/v1/tech/core-concepts/users#what-makes-a-user-active

]]>https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/2326/does-adding-a-new-registration-to-an-application-count-as-an-mauhttps://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/2326/does-adding-a-new-registration-to-an-application-count-as-an-mauInvalid Date<![CDATA[Email Send exception while calling the /registration API]]>Hi,

We are calling the /api/user/registration API to create and register a new user. Our requirement is that we want to send an email verification first to the user, only after the user clicks on the link and verifies the email then we would like the user to be verified in FusioanAuth.

Based on the API documentation it states that when we make a request to this API and if the "skipVerification" is set to default with is "false" it should send an email verification to the newly created user. And then the user should get an email.

Though the call is successful we are getting the following error within the event logs while sending the email.

Async Email Send exception occurred.

Template Id: 0e107c44-a3de-4607-b51c-cd797463ce3a
Template Name: [FusionAuth Default] Email Verification
Tenant Id: 07448f27-ca36-9612-8b9a-bce2e7137351
Addressed to: apekshagb@gmail.com

Cause:
javax.mail.MessagingException : Message: Could not connect to SMTP host: 127.0.0.1, port: 1025

I did try to use an external SMTP server as mailcatcher but that didn't work either. Are we missing any configuration or we need to call a different API?

Regards
Apeksha

]]>https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/1587/email-send-exception-while-calling-the-registration-apihttps://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/1587/email-send-exception-while-calling-the-registration-apiInvalid Date<![CDATA[FusionAuth not registering user in multiple Applications (GO-Client)]]>Solution:

https://github.com/FusionAuth/go-client/issues/48

]]>https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/1493/fusionauth-not-registering-user-in-multiple-applications-go-clienthttps://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/1493/fusionauth-not-registering-user-in-multiple-applications-go-clientInvalid Date<![CDATA[Sessions per application]]>Yes. A user can have one-to-many refresh tokens per application.

]]>https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/1369/sessions-per-applicationhttps://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/1369/sessions-per-applicationInvalid Date<![CDATA[username search against the database?]]>The user and registration may have a username field. The username field on the user is the one that can be used to login. In general you will want to use the Search API for those types of queries rather than directly accessing the database.

The reason is because the API is documented and stable, and the database is undocumented and may change.

]]>https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/1024/username-search-against-the-databasehttps://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/1024/username-search-against-the-databaseInvalid Date<![CDATA[401 Response: Invalid application Id on call to Registrations API]]>Referencing/linking below for future guidance for folks who view this post:

https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/900/authentication-for-an-application-with-web-client-and-mobile-front-ends

]]>https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/925/401-response-invalid-application-id-on-call-to-registrations-apihttps://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/925/401-response-invalid-application-id-on-call-to-registrations-apiInvalid Date<![CDATA[Breached passwords and registrations]]>If you want to use the breached password detection feature, then that check will be applied for any new account registrations.

You could always disable the breached password detection feature.

Sorry, I don't have a better answer for you.

]]>https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/506/breached-passwords-and-registrationshttps://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/506/breached-passwords-and-registrationsInvalid Date<![CDATA[Email verification without sending emails?]]>You could use the skipVerification parameter (set it to true) on the user or registration create statement, and then the https://fusionauth.io/docs/v1/tech/apis/users#resend-verification-email call with sendVerifyEmail set to false.

This would give you a verificationId you could use with this API call: https://fusionauth.io/docs/v1/tech/apis/users#verify-a-users-email

]]>https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/353/email-verification-without-sending-emailshttps://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/353/email-verification-without-sending-emailsInvalid Date<![CDATA[User registration provider data]]>@ashok glad you solved the problem!

The only problem is that I don't seem to be able to pass all the tokens and then "map" it out in the backend.

I'm not sure what you mean here. Are you not seeing all the tokens in the lambda? Or are you not able to put them all in the custom claim?

Also, I think I already know the answer to this and this may sound dumb, but how can you have multiple tokens? A user with multiple providers? If so, how are they consolidated and combined?

A token is tied to a registration/application, so someone could login with google to one FusionAuth application and with facebook to another. Unless I'm missing something, I don't believe they are combined.

Lastly, it would have been nice if user.registrations had a providers field.

We welcome your feature requests 🙂 . Please file a github issue: https://github.com/fusionauth/fusionauth-issues/issues

]]>https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/129/user-registration-provider-datahttps://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/129/user-registration-provider-dataInvalid Date