<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Can You Create Read-Only Roles in FusionAuth?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">We are evaluating the <strong>best permissions</strong> to assign different individuals in our <strong>QA and Production</strong> FusionAuth instances.</p>
<p dir="auto">From the documentation, it seems that roles for <strong>tenants and applications</strong> are either <strong>create/update or delete</strong>, with no built-in <strong>read-only</strong> roles. Additionally, it appears that we <strong>cannot modify the roles</strong> for the <strong>default FusionAuth application</strong>.</p>
<p dir="auto"><strong>Questions</strong>:</p>
<ol>
<li>Is there a way to <strong>introduce read-only roles</strong> in FusionAuth?</li>
<li>If not, is there a plan to add this functionality in a future release?</li>
<li>We want to grant some users <strong>view-only access</strong> without allowing modifications—how can we achieve this?</li>
</ol>
]]></description><link>https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/2935/can-you-create-read-only-roles-in-fusionauth</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 20:18:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/2935.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2025 14:50:31 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can You Create Read-Only Roles in FusionAuth? on Sun, 29 Jun 2025 14:51:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<ol>
<li><strong>Existing Role Limitations in FusionAuth</strong></li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li>FusionAuth provides predefined <strong>Admin UI roles</strong>, which are <strong>not modifiable</strong>.</li>
<li>You can review the available roles here:<br />
<a href="https://fusionauth.io/docs/get-started/core-concepts/roles#fusionauth-admin-ui-roles" rel="nofollow ugc">FusionAuth Admin UI Roles</a></li>
<li>The <strong>default FusionAuth application roles cannot be changed</strong>, which means <strong>read-only roles are not currently available</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<ol start="2">
<li><strong>Requesting Read-Only Roles as a Feature</strong></li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li>FusionAuth does not currently support <strong>read-only access roles</strong> for applications or tenants.</li>
<li>The likely reason for this is that users who need to <strong>view</strong> application/tenant properties often also need to <strong>update</strong> them.</li>
<li>However, you can <strong>submit a feature request</strong> to suggest adding read-only roles:<br />
<a href="https://github.com/FusionAuth/fusionauth-issues/issues/new/choose" rel="nofollow ugc">Submit a Feature Request</a></li>
</ul>
<ol start="3">
<li><strong>Workaround: Implement a Custom Read-Only View</strong></li>
</ol>
<p dir="auto">If immediate read-only access is required, consider:</p>
<ul>
<li>Using the <strong>FusionAuth APIs</strong> to create a <strong>custom dashboard</strong> where users can <strong>view</strong> but <strong>not edit</strong> data.</li>
<li>Relevant APIs for this purpose:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://fusionauth.io/docs/apis/applications" rel="nofollow ugc">Application API</a></li>
<li><a href="https://fusionauth.io/docs/apis/tenants" rel="nofollow ugc">Tenant API</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">Summary</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>No built-in read-only roles</strong> exist for applications or tenants.</li>
<li><strong>FusionAuth Admin UI roles are not modifiable</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>You can request read-only roles as a feature</strong> via GitHub.</li>
<li><strong>A workaround is to build a custom, API-based read-only view</strong>.</li>
</ul>
]]></description><link>https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/post/8075</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/post/8075</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[wesley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2025 14:51:02 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>