@francis-ducharme-0 You may have to parse the json returned from the get and modify a few things. Does the application get created but not work or does the application not get created? I would think you would need to take the relevant parts from the returned application then create the application under a new tenant? Remember you will have to use the new TenantId in the Request Header. If you are not supplying the TenantId, it will use the default.

On a side note: If you are still interested in a duplicate application across tenant feature in the API, you might want to put a request in.

@sergey_smirnov, it is awesome that you are able to follow and create steps to replicate the issue. To be 100% I'm not sure if this is a bug or a feature request. If FusionAuth is not behaving as you would like it, I would suggest opening an issue on Github. Be sure to include the details and repeatable steps.

@john-0 Glad you got it figured out. 👍

Thanks for your answer. I got it.

You’ll need to disable or mock CAPTCHA in a test environment and adjust rate-limit settings in FusionAuth’s config or use test API keys to avoid hitting production limits during automated runs.

@mark-robustelli Thanks for your reply, Mark. If I manage to make it, I’d love to show you how I made it and what it looks like.

Hi @mark-robustelli, thanks for your reply. I need an API that logs out a user, but apparently that’s not possible. Is there any way or approach to log someone out.

Thanks for your answer. I got it.

Yes, I believe so.

It appears that connecting MitID to an application (also called an SP) requires utilizing an approved broker. A broker is essentially an OIDC connector.

Here is a list of official brokers: https://www.mitid.dk/en-gb/broker/current-brokers/.

We haven’t tested this, but based on reviewing Signicat’s OIDC documentation, the process seems fairly straightforward. They are one of the MitID brokers.

@lambert-torres You can get support for FusionAuth. Please see the pricing page if you are interested. I'm not sure if this is your exact situation, but you might want to look at this blog post as well.

@witard91335 Interesting, how do you see the flow working? What kind of tags are you trying to track though FusionAuth?

Good question. I believe this is due to how we implemented our PATCH calls. If you are making a straight API call, you can change the Content-Type header to application/merge-patch+json which will instead overwrite the existing array with whatever you have provided. That's the most straightforward way to replace array values. There are other methods detailed in the doc below but those involve removing values one by one instead of just overwriting them. The downside here is that I don't believe Client Libraries usually support the merge-patch header.

https://fusionauth.io/docs/apis/#the-patch-http-method

If you believe that you have discovered a bug or issue with FusionAuth, please log an issue below.

https://github.com/FusionAuth/fusionauth-issues/issues/new/choose

To note, you will likely want to be listening to the registration.update webhook for changes to the registration object prompted by additional fields the user needs to have completed based on what is a required field for self service registration.

In the case of a user entering all these fields "manually" (as part of a registration form) we will create the user and the registration at the same time (thus transmitting all information, including all required registration fields, as part of the user.create and registration.create events).

However, in the case of a social login, the user and registration will be created after the IdP provider returns information via the user.create and registration.create events. Additional registration will be asked of the user as part of the complete registration process (if there are additional required fields) and that additional information will be transmitted as part of the registration.update event.

https://fusionauth.io/docs/extend/events-and-webhooks/events/user-registration-update

The transient policy is not something FusionAuth will support for the SAML NameID policy. From the SAML standards doc, a transient NameID is supposed to be a temporary value which is not a good basis to build a link between two identity systems on. That is the main reason FusionAuth does not support this policy as it would likely lead to issues later down the line with the Identity Provider. Apologies for the inconvenience but having the User ID/UUID shift or change would cause problems as FA relies on a consistent User ID/UUID(NameID) to make a SAML link work.

http://docs.oasis-open.org/security/saml/v2.0/saml-core-2.0-os.pdf

Currently, there is not a way to turn it off. Our air gapped license is still going to try to make that call out to us, but that won't cause any issues. The difference being that a normal license would have issues if it could not "phone home" back to us whereas the air gapped license won't have issues but it will still try to make those calls.

If you want to change the font on the hosted login page and the login experience users are offered through FusionAuth, then this can be changed via our Themes. Very likely you will want to update the CSS associated with the theme you are using for the FusionAuth Application/Tenant. Changes to the theme can be completed through this API: https://fusionauth.io/docs/apis/themes/advanced-themes.

Alternatively, you can use the Admin UI to make changes to your CSS as well.

Yes with a Basic Cloud you get one custom domain and no backups, you would just need to update your DNS records to include our CNAMEs for this custom domain. You would submit your custom domain via the Hosting tab of the account.fusionauth.io under the Action Drop down. Then you will be shown the CNAME record for that domain and you will have to update your DNS records to include this CNAME. You can see an example of this at the doc below.

https://fusionauth.io/docs/get-started/run-in-the-cloud/cloud#custom-domains

You would not be able to use your own SSL certificates. We would handle all those in FusionAuth Cloud. We create the certificates on our end and you just need to create DNS records to validate the domain with the CNAME records.

There are a few ways you can get what you need. You can either make these changes via the API and then they will be updated in the UI.

https://fusionauth.io/docs/get-started/core-concepts/users#user-data

https://fusionauth.io/docs/apis/users#update-a-user

Or you can do this using custom admin forms:

https://fusionauth.io/docs/lifecycle/manage-users/admin-forms

The license ID is just the license key itself. You can grab your license here https://account.fusionauth.io/account/plan/. Each license will have a prod key and non-prod key, for testing you just need to grab the non-prod key and use that for your license ID in Kickstart.

https://fusionauth.io/docs/get-started/download-and-install/development/kickstart#set-your-license-id

If you are using the React SDK (which uses Hosted Backend: https://fusionauth.io/docs/apis/hosted-backend, then there are a couple options but they will all require some integration work from your end. The SDKs and Hosted Backend are designed to be easy to use and implement but they are not flexible as you can see with the cookies. Also I'm not sure if this was a consideration in the decision that running FusionAuth locally is not an option but just in case it was: You can use your FusionAuth non-production licenses wherever you want, we do not charge more "per deployment". So you can activate your non-prod license on a locally hosted FusionAuth instance in addition to your FusionAuth on Azure App Service, you can run your non-prod license on as many instances as you want.

Develop your application while hosting it on Azure App service so FusionAuth and the app are on the same domain

Setup a proxy for either your application or FusionAuth so they can be on the same domain

Documentation for setting up a proxy for FusionAuth: https://fusionauth.io/docs/operate/deploy/proxy-setup

Create your own Hosted Backend, example here: https://github.com/FusionAuth/fusionauth-javascript-sdk-express/tree/main

Similar to #3, instead of setting up a Hosted Backend use the OAuth2 endpoints directly. In this scenario you will also be responsible for doing the OAuth code exchange for a token then setting the token cookies on the browser as well as session management with these tokens.

https://fusionauth.io/docs/lifecycle/authenticate-users/oauth/endpoints

https://fusionauth.io/docs/operate/secure/token-storage