ah, thanks for explaining.

I can't see any way to do this. The behavior of these grants are outlined in the RFC, so are pretty limited in flexibility. It looks like auth0 allows something similar to this, so I'm guessing it's not against the spec.

I looked through some code and didn't find support for that. Can you please file an feature request outlining your use case? https://github.com/fusionauth/fusionauth-issues

Hi @peter-babinec ,

Thanks for looking at the existing issues. I'd say that #178 is close too. Here's our general statement on our roadmap.

Based on the number of votes that these issues have, we can't commit to a near term solution for you.

Your options:

engage us via a professional services agreement to build this feature out. We're happy to give quotes after discussing requirements. build out a custom login interface using the login API, which will let you control the UI/UX entirely.

Regarding your second suggestion:

Also it would be nice to provide "more options" button on the login screen for accessing other login methods (e.g. using email and password) even though the user is configured to login via specific IdP.

Please file a feature request, as I don't think that use case is covered by any existing request.

Hope this helps.

Thanks! I appreciate it.

I will keep track using the link, and i'll thumbs up the issues.

Ah, great. So unfortunately, since this feature request is open, the functionality hasn't been built yet, but is on the roadmap. Here are your options to influence the roadmap:

https://fusionauth.io/community/forum/topic/172/the-fusionauth-roadmap

If you'd like APIs to automatically log to the audit log, without additional calls to the Audit Log API, please vote for this issue: https://github.com/FusionAuth/fusionauth-issues/issues/507

I think you want skipVerification set to true.

From the docs:

Whether or not email verification should be skipped or not. In some cases, you might want to verify User’s emails and in other cases you won’t. This flag controls that behavior.

I'd start at https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/index.html and read the reference documentation.

HTH.

Hmmm.

Here's an issue tracking digitalocean database issues--some managed databases don't work right now: https://github.com/FusionAuth/fusionauth-issues/issues/95

The number of open connections should be around 10. I believe that is per fusionauth instance.

What were the specs you were seeing the issues with?

what version of fusionauth how many pods running it what version of postgres what size were the pods (in terms of memory and CPU) what are the replication steps to trigger the negative performance impacts

We've seen FusionAuth (the application) run in 64M of RAM. You can specify the maximum amount of memory used in the configuration file or via environment args. More here: https://fusionauth.io/docs/v1/tech/reference/configuration

Note that if you don't need advanced search functionality, you can use the database search engine and avoid running elasticsearch: https://fusionauth.io/docs/v1/tech/tutorials/switch-search-engines talks about how to switch between them. That may eliminate some of the memory pressure if you were running elastic.

There are many using FusionAuth in this manner, we don't currently offer any specific documentation on integrating with API Gateways.

I would love to have this documentation at some point, however as far as I know most if not all of the options I've seen have a fairly standard integration using a JWT.

Once you know what the Gateway such as Kong is looking for in the JWT to perform authorization you can use the JWT populate lambda to ensure the JWT has everything you need.

https://fusionauth.io/docs/v1/tech/lambdas/jwt-populate
https://fusionauth.io/docs/v1/tech/oauth/tokens

Hope that helps!

Hi,

If you are just using OAuth, I'd follow this tutorial from Microsoft: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/mvc/overview/older-versions/using-oauth-providers-with-mvc

You can use OAuth with FusionAuth without using the client libraries at all. It's only when you need to call APIs outside of OAuth that you'll need the API key and the client libraries.

Let me know if that helps!

So there are a number of ways to approach this, but they'll all require you to write some code.

I don't know your current system or skillset, but this is how I'd do it:

have someone sign up to create a club in an application in the default tenant. create the tenant, but no users in the tenant. You could set defaults as needed. verify they are a real club (in whatever way you desire) on verification, add an application and a user account based on the account in the default teannt. Notify the user via email that their club account is now available. users can then sign in to the created application in the new tenant.

If you need the ability to deactivate the tenant, I'd write a script that deactivates all applications within a tenant and possibly deactivates the user in the default tenant. Note that when a user can't log in to an application, you may have to check carefully for an HTTP status, see more here.

Is there a way to customize the login process to check other conditions besides the credentials, in this case the 'verified' attribute?

If you are using the login API, you can check any number of items on the user or other objects, but you have to build your own pages. If you are using the OAuth grants or the provided login pages, there are no customizations like you suggest available. Please feel free to file a github issue with details of how you'd like this feature to work.

Hope this helps.

Hiya,

I see a method that looks useful: ExchangeOAuthCodeForAccessToken in this file:

https://github.com/FusionAuth/fusionauth-csharp-client/blob/master/src/main/csharp/FusionAuthClient.cs

Looks like it was released in version 1.12.0. What version are you using?

At this point, after the login process, do I have to apply for the token again with username and password? if I want to access the token from API?

When you get the access token, you can then present it to whatever needs to verify the user is logged in. If you enable refresh tokens, you can store that off and present it for a new access token without the user logging in again. Check out this post about how the authorization code grant works for more details.

.net core doesn't work with older frameworks of asp.net(4.5.2.) installation error.

I filed an issue about that. Not sure we can fix it, since ASP.NET 4.5.2 is over 5 years old, but at least we can take a look.

@wwelchj is correct.

However, note that FusionAuth considers the sending of the password email to be a form of email verification. From the docs:

If you have also enabled email verification and do not select to skip verification using the skipVerification parameter, only the setup password email will be sent to the user. Setting up the password using the email sent during this user create operation will implicitly verify the User’s email if it is not already verified.

Hmmm. Can you share the token text, please?

We validate using RFC 5322 which defines the local part as a dot-atom;

“that is, it contains no characters other than atext characters or “.” surrounded by atext characters.

As far as I know the examples given are not valid email addresses. I think the only way you can begin or end an email address with a . is if it is quoted.

@dan yes this answers my question perfectly! I appreciate the detailed answer.

While we continue to improve FusionAuth (and will always have a free community edition), if you are interested in paying for a specific feature to be built, we're happy to chat. Please contact us and we'll be happy to discuss costs and timelines.

This may be useful if what you are trying to extract is in ElasticSearch (user data): https://elastalert.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

Doesn't help with other aspects of the system, but I believe we have some features planned.

Yes, any variable defined in kickstart can be used in any of the includes.